开放期刊系统

深圳市肥胖中学生行为习惯影响因素及运动干预策略研究

朱 猛

摘要

本研究旨在探析高中阶段肥胖学生的主要行为影响因素,并基于实证研究构建科学有效的个性化运动干预模式,
同时结合国际经验提出优化策略。采用整群抽样法选取深圳市高级中学肥胖学生 286 名(BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 的),通过修
订版《青少年健康行为量表》开展行为调查并结合体质测试,采用有序多分类 Logistic 回归筛选核心影响因素,设计为期
8 周的“有氧 + 抗阻”复合运动干预方案并开展随机对照试验,分析干预效果及执行度。结果显示,该校肥胖检出率为
11.50%,高于全国同年龄段平均水平(9.6%),男生肥胖率显著高于女生(16.99% vs. 6.6%)。Logistic 回归分析提示,晚
餐摄入量(OR=3.42,p=0.003)和临睡前加餐(OR=2.86,p=0.001)为肥胖的显著风险因素,规律锻炼频率(≥ 3 次 / 周)
对肥胖风险具有显著保护作用(OR=0.47,p=0.008)。干预 8 周后,干预组体脂率下降 3.2%,BMI 降低 1.8±0.6 kg/m2

耐力跑成绩提升 45 秒,均显著优于对照组(p<0.05),其中执行度优秀组效果更显著(体脂率下降 4.1% vs. 1.9%)。研究
表明,高中阶段肥胖防控应重点关注晚餐和夜宵摄入控制,保障每周至少 3 次“有氧 + 抗阻”规律锻炼,建议结合国际先
进经验构建“家庭 – 学校 – 社会”多维协同干预模式,并推动 BMI 动态监测纳入学生健康管理体系,实现青少年肥胖防
控的系统化、个性化与可持续性。

关键词

青少年肥胖;行为干预;运动处方;体质健康。

全文:

PDF

参考

[1] WHO. Global status report on physical activity 2022.

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

[2] World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight.

WHO Fact Sheets. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight

[3] NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide

trends in BMI, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to

2022: a pooled analysis of 2,416 population-based measurement

studies. Lancet. 2024;403(10399):1193–1210.

[4] Twig G, Yaniv G, Levine H, et al. Body-Mass Index in 2.3

Million Adolescents and Cardiovascular Death in Adulthood[J]. N

Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2430–2440.

[5] Griffiths LJ, Parsons TJ, Hill AJ. Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents: a systematic review[J].

Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5(4):282–304.

[6] Rankin J, Matthews L, Cobley S, et al. Psychological

consequences of childhood obesity: Psychiatric comorbidity and

prevention[J]..Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2016;7:125–146.

[7] Brown T, Moore THM, Hooper L, et al. Interventions for

preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev[J].

2019;2019(7):CD001871.

[8] Guerra PH, Nobre MR, da Silveira JA, et al. The effect of

school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index:

A meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo).

2013;68(9):1263-1273.

[9] Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, et al. A systematic

review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in

sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a

conceptual model of health through sport[J].Int J Behav Nutr Phys

Act. 2013;10:98.

[10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS)[J]. MMWR

Suppl. 2014;63(4):1–168.

[11] 教育部 . 国家学生体质健康标准(2014 年修订)[S].

北京 : 教育部 , 2014.

[12] Dashti HS, Scheer FAJL, Jacques PF, et al. Short sleep

duration and dietary intake: epidemiologic evidence, mechanisms,

and health implications[J].. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(6):648–659.

[13] World Health Organization. WHO 2020 guidelines

on physical activity and sedentary behavior[J]. Br J Sports Med.

2020;54(24):1451–1462.

[14] US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical

Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition. Washington, DC:

US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.

[15] Haapala H L, Hirvensalo M H, Laine K, et al.

Adolescents’ physical activity at recess and actions to promote a

physically active school day in four Finnish schools. Health Educ

Res[J]. 2014;29(5):840 852.

[16] Miyoshi M, Tsuboyama Kasaoka N, Nishi N.

School based “Shokuiku” program in Japan: application to

nutrition education in Asian countries[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr.

2012;21(1):159 162.

[17] Castilho Dos Santos G, de Souza Silva TM, da Silva JM,

et al. Impact of the ActTeens Program on physical activity and

fitness in adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial[J].

BMC Pediatr. 2024;24(1):447.

[18] Pawlowski CS, Ergler CR, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, et

al. "Like a soccer camp for boys": a qualitative exploration of

gendered activity patterns in Active School design[J]. Health

Place. 2014;30:155-164.


(0 摘要 Views, 0 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • 当前没有refback。