开放期刊系统

瘢痕子宫再次妊娠不完全性子宫破裂的回顾性研究

康 祺, 孔 令丹, 税 阿瑜, 姚守 润*

摘要

探索瘢痕子宫再次妊娠不完全性子宫破裂(Incomplete uterine rupture,IUR)的子宫下段(Lower Uterine Segment,LUS)肌层厚度及并发医源性早产的相关因素。方法:回顾性分析2012年3月至2021年11月就诊于北京市第六医院的130例剖宫产术中诊断IUR患者病例资料,其中早产组27例,足月组103例。收集IUR孕妇术前10天内B超测定的LUS肌层厚度值,Mann-Whitney U检验比较术前10天与术前24小时测定的LUS肌层厚度。卡方检验比较早产组与足月组的临床特征、LUS肌层情况及手术指征。结果:瘢痕子宫再次妊娠IUR术前10天内B超测定LUS肌层中位数厚度均<0.2cm,术前10天与术前24小时LUS肌层厚度差异无统计学意义。早产组中妊娠次数、多次剖宫产史、先兆子宫破裂、下腹瘢痕处疼痛或压痛多于足月组,距前次剖宫产间隔时间少于足月组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。年龄、BMI、人流次数、LUS肌层厚度在两组比较中,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:妊娠次数、下腹瘢痕处疼痛或压痛、多次剖宫产史及距前次剖宫产间隔时间与不完全子宫破裂并发医源性早产有关。

关键词

瘢痕子宫;再次妊娠;子宫破裂

全文:

PDF

参考

[1]HATSTAT L M. Sonographic Assessment of Uterine Dehiscence During Pregnancy in Women With a History of Cesarean Section:A Case Series [J].2016,32(5):283-286.

[2]AL-ZIRQI I, VANGEN S.产前子宫破裂:特点和结果[J]. Bjog,2020,127(13):1637-1644.

[3]JUNG N, MAGUER-SATTA V, GUYOT B. Early Steps of Mammary Stem Cell Transformation by Exogenous Signals; Effects of Bisphenol Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Bone Morphogenetic Proteins [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2019, 11(9).

[4]GIZZO S, ZAMBON A, SACCARDI C, et al. Effective anatomical and functional status of the lower uterine segment at term: estimating the risk of uterine dehiscence by ultrasound [J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 99(2): 496-501.

[5]THOMAS A, REBEKAH G, VIJAYASELVI R, et al. Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Measurement of Lower Uterine Segment in Term Pregnant Patients with Previous Cesarean Section %J Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [J]. 2015, Vol.05No.11: 8.

[6]GOTOH H, MASUZAKI H, YOSHIDA A, et al.在曾行剖宫产术的孕妇中,通过阴道超声检查预测妊娠中期晚期子宫不完全破裂[J].ObstetGynecol,2000,95(4):596-600.

[7]ZHU Z, LI H, ZHANG J.既往有剖宫产史的孕妇子宫破裂[J].Ann Med,2021,53(1):1265-1269.

[8]QURESHI B, INAFUKU K, OSHIMA K, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study [J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 1997, 183(1): 55-65.

[9]ROZENBERG P, SéNAT M V, DERUELLE P, et al.评价有剖宫产史妇女分娩前超声测量子宫下段的有效性:一项随机试验[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2022,226(2): 253.e251-253.e259.

[10]LANDON M B, SPONG C Y, THOM E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(1): 12-20.

[11]RAO J, FAN D, MA H, et al. Is there an optimal inter-delivery interval in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC)? [J]. Reprod Health, 2022, 19(1): 14.

[12]FITZPATRICK K E, KURINCZUK J J, ALFIREVIC Z, et al. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study [J]. PLoS Med, 2012, 9(3): e1001184.

[13]ZHANG X, CHEN X, LI B, et al. Changes in the live birth profile in Henan, China: A hospital registry-based study [J].Birth,2022.


(1 摘要 Views, 2 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • 当前没有refback。